Why so large?

Back Next

 

Home
The proposal
The inspiration
You Tube videos
Google videos
Decision-making
Work requirement
Money requirement
Personal income
Necessities provided
War and crime
Usury +  exploitation
Health +  diet
Population reality
Debt
The challenge
Similar projects
What others say
Contact info-pic.
Issues and explanations
Resources

 

Around a few hundred, it is theorized (and no one knows exactly what the numbers should or could be) to be of the necessary size for social self sufficiency, to have enough children so that there are age-appropriate playmates and enough numbers to make a community school practical, to be efficient in the use of labor, and the size most  practical  for  the sharing of resources. Also, there are general issues regarding youth, old age and living in a truly ecological and a truly just (economically) way as well as in a truly sustainable way. In other words, to be truly efficient, relatively self sufficient and low cost, movement of the type requiring great expense (i.e. complex machinery and requiring large quantities of energy-chemical, mechanical or human) and  that needlessly wastes time, should or would be kept to a minimum.

Non required  travel (travel for pleasure, cultural exchange, learning and so on) would actually be greatly facilitated. Why? click here. For why travel can be so important?  Click here.

While some may consider the ethics, too idealistic, and the requirement of approximately  2 days  a week or four hours a day of work (for "room and board") to be unrealistic (Gandhi thought 2 hrs per day was enough, and Scott Nearing thought 4. Also see "similar projects.)............my response is the following:

1) If one can't think of worthwhile reasons to achieve these goals, or live these ethics, then of course they won't seem, or be, attainable.

2) The reasons for, and benefits of living this way would go far beyond taking care of the necessities in a relatively short time.

3) It's doubtful these goals can be achieved with a much smaller community, nor would a smaller community be as interesting or vital place to live in.

4) It may be that one can't conceive of a large community because one doesn't wish to give up ones privileged (likely unjust) economic status, give up ones (likely unjust and ecologically destructive) extravagances, and give up ones (cherished, yet bad for one's health) addictions; even through some sort of human perfection isn't necessary, required, nor expected.  

 





HOME

Miscellaneous
audio
benefits
 Jack Reed
Ted Trainer
 


home   Phone 352-505-8082  email  cooperativecommunity@cox.net  last update - October 13, 2008